We had our consultation with Jeremy this morning. As discussed, the focus was initially on the PSA test I had done on the 12th (this being about 6 weeks after the operation). The level was 0.9, whereas the previous test (prior to the surgery) had been 9.9. Obviously the former seems a lot better than the latter. Following a prostatectomy, however, the desirable level is 0.0. So anything higher than 0.5 confirms some residual disease. The question is, where? Another scan is required to locate and determine what is going on. I am therefore going to have another whole body PSMA/PET procedure at the Alfred – they are going to ring me to set this up. This will probably be in January.
While it is slightly disappointing not to be home free, I didn’t actually expect the test result to come back zero. So as far as I am concerned, it is not as bad as it could have been. If the disease is within the pelvic area, radio therapy can be used (see no. 3 below). Jeremy is always keen to point out the positives:
- I have had the optimal first treatment, i.e. the prostatectomy. (Jeremy said last time this would have removed 99% of the cancers.) Therefore we are not in a rush to determine the next treatment.
- The disease is PSMA-avid. This makes it easier to see it because it shows up on a PSMA-PET scan. Easier to see means that
- Stereotactic radio therapy can be used. This is a specific kind of RT with much lower side effects. A 2016 study of stereotactic body radio therapy found “a 98.6 percent cure rate with SBRT, a noninvasive form of radiation treatment that involves high-dose radiation beams entering the body through various angles and intersecting at the desired target. It is a state-of-the-art technology that allows for a concentrated dose to reach the tumor while limiting the radiation dose to surrounding healthy tissue.”
I also saw Susannah the physio this afternoon. She is encouraging me to become less reliant on pads. (The urinary continence has certainly improved since I saw her last.) She said that going pad-free speeds up recovery of more normal levels of continence, and is better for the perineal region. Obviously I will be selective about when I do this, e.g. not while engaged in activities that cause leaking, while I have people over, etc.
I have a new exercise to do, which involves bending over to pick up a 2 kilo weight. I am to do this 15 times. (Needless to say I will be engaging the pelvic floor the while.) The aim of this exercise is to teach the muscles greater endurance. I will check in with her again when I know the date of the PSMA/PET scan.
It has been very hot here, about 37 at one point. The change has come through and dropped the temperature to 23, with some rain.
Dear Guy, mixed news but overall lots of positives. I hope the prospect of another whole body scan is not too daunting. SBRT sounds to have some excellent aspects. Congratulations on the improvement in continence, which must be a great relief on many levels! Love, Jane
LikeLike
This was good to read Guy – just googled PMSA which now makes more sense to me – interesting to hear that if PSA is between 0.5-1 then detection of any existing tumor is 73%. Over 2 PSA then 97%. That is promising for early detection for SBRT treatment while PSA is low. Xo
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Georgia. There is a lot of new terminology to translate! I found a prostate cancer dictionary that is supposedly available for anyone to add to their site. However, it didn’t work when I tried this out. TBC. See you soon!
LikeLike